https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |
I've informed the municipality about the missing addresses in this building. 5B isn't the only one. (terugmelding gedaan)
By the way, there's no Picnic yet here in the OSM data.
Yeah, I didn't add anything for Picnic here because of lack of address data. I want to add it when everything would be correct and then it would be done by one pipeline for every POI spot.
A pipeline? You aren't using automation, are you? Because that's bound to rules!
No, no automation, I meant that all edits for these points should be made in the same way, so that you have no complaints against us.
Good, because this matter was already raised in the forum by Friendly_Ghost (though we didn't get a response to it from Mapbox).
(and by 'this matter' I mean automated edits in general)
Good, of course we all understand that your are not ok with some uncoordinated imports and such import this is not the thing we work with.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10156589889 has been added recently.
Municipality has added numbers 5-1 to 5-4 and 5-6 and removed 5 from the BAG data. No 5B..