GenaD's Diary Comments
Diary Comments added by GenaD
Post | When | Comment |
---|---|---|
How good (bad) is water represented in OpenSteetMap? | Thanks for the link, comments and imagico, very useful! There certainly will be more issues and you’re right about the ‘very different things’. However, all 3 datasets still indicate places with the maximum likelihood of water. With a proper understanding - a nice data fusion should be possible. In any case, I want to analyse the differences pairwise between different dataset after splitting them into areas where different approach can be used to do the analysis. For example:
… OpenStreetMap water based on 1m imagery is still better, but we don’t know that. From what I saw, water centerline for wide rivers is not always a centerline in OSM. I’m not sure if there is an agreement on that, most probably if differs from place to place. For modeling applications it would be actually good to have a geometric centerline and then thalweg.
Based on flow accumulation area it will be possible to estimate approximately how big the river ~actually is. Maybe based on the landuse can estimate the SRTM noise.
About applicability to other areas, I expect the following dataset to come out somewhere soon: Peckel, 2014, so my focus is not to “detect water in the best way using LANDSAT” but rather to focus on the methodology to compare different vector/raster river datasets given watermask based on LANDSAT. |