OpenStreetMap

lzygenius's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by lzygenius

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
open 3412711 lzygenius

Add new building when construction is complete

closed 1307049

onosm.org submitted note from a business:
Name: The Hub @ UV
Phone: 5308986325
Website: http://www.csuchico.edu/housing/current-residents/leadership-engagement/uhub.shtml
Twitter: undefined
Hours: Monday-Thursday 4pm-10pm, Friday 4pm-2am, Saturday 2pm-2am, Sunday 2pm-10pm
Category: University Housing
Address: 1325 Nord Avenue Chico, CA 95926

closed 2420035 lzygenius

I'm not sure what this commenter is referring to. the current layout reflects the streets currently in this area, although some were misnamed

closed 2027467

SUBIE X CULT Social Club.

closed 1858726 lzygenius

closed 3412218 lzygenius

On an app, USPS, UPS and FedEx box here

via StreetComplete 47.2

open 1506497 freebeer

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10293798
sidewalk=both is wrong. that would be only applicable to european-style residential pavements that directly abut the street.
not here, where there is a physical separation so that many users will have difficulty navigating except at designated drjveways, ramps or other access.
.
this prticular intersection is too tree-infested to see if this is bogus, but i agree about the missing segment.
that crosswalk to the west is visibly painted, but i do not know the legal status or intent here, and wnether it may be comparable to a zebra or pelican crossing, or just an unprivileged marked crossing, maybe for cycles. The node where it joins needs to be marked as the apropriate crosswalk, and continued to the as-yet-unmapped sidewalk opposite.
archive bing seems to hint at something here, but i do not know from afar what purpose it may serve.
but to the east i see a number of unmapped driveways that can serve (laws permitting) for wheelchair and cycle as well as keep-off-the-grass pedestrian access and routing.
there also seem to be a number of too-small-for-driveway accesses that are unmapped, and those too need to be mapped and the left/right/bothh should be scrapped, as there is a physical grass separation.
.
i will look around a bit more to interpret your descriptions, but I see at Lassen Hall southwest, there is no connection from the footpath to the nearby entrance node.
more comments will follow, but i thought this much may get you started. it is difficult matching real-world mapping to the schematic mapping also taking place here, particularly where near me in order to return to an adjoining pavement after passing a physical impassible barrier, the schematic non-separation implies a change of direction to return to being next to the road, when in reality the road widens following the two-metre-wide barrier.
.
more later, probably, as i still have not commented on a other note concerning routing dead-ends (where if i interpret the data right, part of the pavement is mapped on the wrong side of the road, and again there are too many trees).

« Previous | Page 1 | Next »