Changeset: 20062852
(no comment)
Closed by Milos Cekovic
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (6238 en) |
---|
Discussion
-
Comment from luschi
please use for trees "natural=tree"
"natural=wood" or "landuse=forest" are wrong!
please fix this and other trees mapped from you.
thanks -
Comment from Milos Cekovic
These are not single trees, but in very most cases more than one tree or large bushes (hasel or similar). I agree with you tat single trees should be marked with natural=tree, e.g. the gloriuous oak tree on the Wintersinger Höchi. But in the case you are mentioning, natural=wood or landuse=forest is IMHO much more appropriate than single tree, because as said not single tree is there. The official guidance for natural=tree is saying: "Einzelner oder signifikanter Baum".
What should I do? Change or leave as-is?
-
Comment from luschi
mapping trees or 2-3 trees in this way is not the best solution.
natural=wood is for woodland with no forestry and in this place defenitly wrong.
So better you change to landuse=forest.
in some places you can use natural=tree_row
you can use natural=scrub for hasel or similar. Hasel is in a lot of places only a bush and not a tree.
landuse=orchard is a other option.
to find the correct tag is in some places hard and so all the natural=... tags you can use as a area.
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |