Changeset: 31101038
Rīga also is city
Closed by mg-code
Tags
browser | Chrome 42.0 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 1.7.2 |
host | http://www.openstreetmap.org/id |
imagery_used | Bing |
locale | en-GB |
platform | Windows |
Discussion
-
Comment from AkageMuk
Hi there is already a multipolygon for place=city for Riga. This one was for borders only.
-
Comment from AkageMuk
Reverted in #31102724. Tag place=city is set up for this relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2921953
-
Comment from mg-code
What is the point of multiple relations for same place?
E.g. Jelgava also has administrative level 6 and place=city.
Unfortunately some of Latvian sites are in same administrative level as counties. But they are same, we don't have two Rigas or two Jelgavas in Latvia. -
Comment from mg-code
*Latvian cities.
-
Comment from AkageMuk
Most probably it is due to LV cities also are entities of administrative division. As I understand one relation has all the border and administrative division tags and have type=border. Other relation have type=multipolygon and have all place (city) related tags.
Current scheme is really bogus, as place nodes also have many place related tags, but of course no border tags.
Current division could be submitted for talk discussion, I only removed place tag from the border type relation (otherwise it would be two similar multipolygons with place). -
Comment from AkageMuk
E.g. for Riga place multipolygon was introduced two years ago, as introduction comment says for address search fix.
"type=border" relation defines only border related stuff, thus a multipolygon relation has to be defined for a place polygon. But yeah, it is clumsy :(
Relations (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |