Changeset: 39362125
addresses added (source: map.geo.admin.ch)
Closed by keujfl839237
Tags
created_by | iD 1.9.4 |
---|---|
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/id |
imagery_used | Bing |
locale | en-us |
Discussion
-
Comment from SOSM
Sorry, but map.geo.admin.ch is NOT a legal source of data for OSM. When you signed up for your OSM account you agreed to only using legit sources.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
Sorry, I was not aware that address information (from the Federal Register of Buildings and Housing) is protected by copyright. Is there a simple way to revert my edits?
-
Comment from keujfl839237
So it is only allowed to add addresses by own survey?
-
Comment from SOSM
The GWR is not protected by copyright but far more by the specific law and ordinance that governs it use (copyright would likely apply to maps.geo.admin.ch in general). Note that the terms of use of maps.geo.admin.ch are clear about its contents not being open data.
We have access to address data in a number of cantons and in the city of Zürich (see http://sosm.ch/projects/swiss-open-addresses/ ), outside of those areas you need to survey addresses.
Can you identify the changesets in which you used GWR data without too much trouble?
-
Comment from keujfl839237
I could make a list but it may be easier to revert all my edits, if that is possible. I am sorry for my ignorance. I did not intent to violate copyright.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
Or I could remove the addresses manually.
-
Comment from SOSM
We can likely simply revert the address additions, but lets see what the DWG says.
Note you are not the first nor likely the last to mistakenly use data that they shouldn't, please don't feel to bad about it.
The other annoying point is that the laws wrt use of the GWR were scheduled to change at the beginning of this year, with bit of a hope that we would then be able to use the data, however that has been delayed.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
Here is a list of edits for which I used the Federal Register of Buildings and Housing or the city map of Bern: 33735714, 33736901, 33737124, 33737255, 33737434, 33737460, 33737508, 33737582, 33752228, 33752379, 33752808, 33753358, 33753528, 33753766, 33753927, 33754117, 33754408, 33754950, 33760350, 33760532, 33777921, 33778662, 33779624, 33779998, 34472217, 34472399, 34472788, 34472832, 34475345, 34475407, 34475516, 34475773, 34477131, 39334495, 39336719, 39337142, 39337341, 39347567, 39347673, 39348376, 39348574, 39350157, 39355649, 39356023, 39356430, 39356821, 39359093, 39362037, 39362125, 47916585, 47917014, 47917397, 47974878, 47983259, 47983344, 47984007, 47984124, 47984410, 48012605, 48014689, 48015226, 48037150, 48037216, 48037693, 48037760, 48038003, 48040379, 48041057, 48041160, 48041743, 48042232, 48063748, 48064154, 48064758, 48064948, 48081813, 48094562, 48094796, 48095455, 48096370. However I often made other changes (with Bing or own survey/knowledge as source) at the same time.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
The list above is not correct. Here is the correct list: 33735714, 33736459, 33736901, 33737124, 33737255, 33752228, 33752379, 33752808, 33753358, 33753528, 33753766, 33753927, 33754117, 33754408, 33754950, 33760350, 33760532, 33777921, 33778662, 33779624, 33779998, 34472217, 34472399, 34472788, 34472832, 34475345, 34475407, 34475516, 34475773, 34477131, 39334495, 39336719, 39337142, 39337341, 39347567, 39347673, 39348376, 39348574, 39350157, 39355649, 39356023, 39356430, 39356821, 39359093, 39362037, 39362125, 47916585, 47917014, 47917397, 47974878*, 47983259*, 47983344*, 47984007*, 47984124*, 47984410*, 48012605, 48014689, 48015226, 48037150, 48037216, 48037693, 48037760, 48038003, 48040379, 48041057, 48041160, 48041743, 48042232, 48063748, 48064758, 48064948, 48081813, 48088570, 48094562, 48094796, 48095455, 48096370
* Addresses from map.bern.ch/stadtplan. 'Quelle: Stadt Bern; Amtliche Vermessung; OpenStreetMap contributors'
-
Comment from keujfl839237
Has there been a reaction from DWG in the meantime?
-
Comment from datendelphin
Yes there was, but they did not yet remove the data. There is another (larger) case still open which used the same source. I guess it will be done together.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
I've removed the addresses manually yesterday.
-
Comment from keujfl839237
Hi, when I deleted the addresses manually a year ago, I didn't know they are still in the database. Don't they still have to be permanently deleted? Please excuse my ignorance and impatience ...
-
Comment from SimonPoole
In the mean time we have permission to use the GWR dataset so the discussion is moot.
Ways (8)
- 418711765, v1
- 239338669, v2
- 239338671, v2
- 239338588, v2
- 239338579, v2
- 239338668, v2
- 239338667, v2
- 239338612, v2
Nodes (16)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |