Changeset: 43159368
new elements, MP integrations
Closed by SHARCRASH
Tags
created_by | iD 1.9.7 |
---|---|
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/id |
imagery_used | lu.geoportail.opendata.ortho2010 |
locale | en |
Discussion
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Hi SHARCRASH,
Can you explain what https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6312533 is supposed to be? It seems to be an unrelated series of features.
Perhaps have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ?
Best Regards,
Andy -
Comment from SHARCRASH
No, it's the same feature, it's supposed to be landuse=meadow. Actually field for pasture and for hay are always entwined and should be considered the same feature with a single element. In reality, farmers alternate this rotation process between pasture and hay (to give the land a rest) on a field to keep the land healthy. I always wanted to add this explanation in OSM wiki, but forgot or didn't have the time.
-
Comment from SHARCRASH
It was part of this MP http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6312533
but Woodpeck broke it. As you can see, history doesn't reflect Woodpeck's edits which may mislead on who did the certain edits. -
Comment from SomeoneElse
That relation as of 1st November can be viewed at http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jWT . Can you explain what the two pieces of meadow west of the CR106 have in common with each other, and with the piece to the east, apart from happening to have the same tags?
-
Comment from SHARCRASH
Not everybody has the knowledge to see in there. Why should people look in several different places for the same kind of data (historic purposes)? This misleads people! With all due respect, I can't explain in detail because i feel that i've already enough wasted time with futile explanations whereas i think that i did my best to contribute with accuracy as much as possible. If you recall we had a discussion with the fact that at least i comment my edits whereas so many people don't even care. But i can say very simply that the point of a MP is to share the same tags (obviously as you even pointed) and also being able to tag the perimeter with specific features as i did in there.
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
No - the point of a multipolygon is not to share the same tags. It's to joining things that really are related in the real world.
Ways (10)
- 449382554, v1
- 449382556, v1
- 449382557, v1
- 449382559, v1
- 449382560, v1
- 424620714, v3
- 449377822, v2
- Rue de Dahlem (27455871), v22
- Rue de Dahlem (418256282), v2
- 28050302, v39
Relations (3)
Nodes (8)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |