Changeset: 49840387
Fixing landuse and park
Closed by piligab
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (12275 en) |
---|---|
source | Bing |
Discussion
-
Comment from Oleg_MD
Hello.
I noticed that you have changed the status of 3 areas, from "park" to "forest"; thank you for your contribution :-)
But the reason why I have initially marked these areas as "park", is because they have very small surfaces, and I know that in reality these areas are not forests, but actually are small parks (normally covered with trees).
So, my general question would be:
when do we start to consider a group of trees as a forest? Can we assume, for instance, that a dozen of trees, that grow very close to each other, represent a forest? I saw many examples in OSM where parks with compacts groups of trees are not always marked as forests? (for example, some areas from the New York Central Park are covered compactly with trees, but OSM don't reflect this).I will appreciate very much your position on this issue.
Regards,
Oleg -
Comment from piligab
Hi Oleg.
Yes, I changed the status of 3 areas, from "park" to "forest"; because in these areas, according the Bing imagery I saw only agglomerated trees and there aren't open space, for this reason I considered as a `forest`. Instead it should be considered as a `park` when there are more open spaces where people can walk, play (green area for recreation).Regarding the comment, if you thought it was private and it was not private, there is no problem. Many times we make comments in the changes that are made to know the reason of the change, to learn and if maybe we had an error we can correct it thanks to the feedback. Don't worry.
Regards.
Ways (3)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |