Changeset: 52107269
Cbd survey.
Closed by samuelrussell
Tags
created_by | Go Map!! 1.4 |
---|
Discussion
-
Comment from Harald Hartmann
Hello samuelrussell. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5110232349 you have used `amenity=toilet;drinking_water`. I think you should remove `drinking_water` and use it as key: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/drinking_water
And please `amenity=toilets` (with s) ;-)
Also `ambulant` is a new (and so far unkown and undocumented) key. What is it for? -
Comment from samuelrussell
Cheers for your work. I often map mobile and haven't fully customised my editor.
ambulant = yes is modelled off wheelchair = yes
In Australian toilets a new access category of "ambulant" has developed recently catering to people with walkers, crutches, canes or other upright mobility differences. These toilet stalls are larger with "swing out" doors and often grips to allow the upright with mobility issues to more easily use toilet stalls.
Does that make sense from a tagging perspective? I can photo an ambulant stall and add it to wikimedia commons for consideration by editors who work on key and value consistency?
-
Comment from Harald Hartmann
Good question. Other question: right now, what's the benefit of your mappings with all the new keys, if they aren't documented and/or discussed, so that other mappers and then also renderers or apps would use it, too?
-
Comment from samuelrussell
I'm mapping what is apparent on the ground and of interest. Like access to toilets meeting a mobility need. Or sharps bins. Half of the essential tagging for bicycle use doesn't exist in opencyclemap and I am not going to tag for render.
-
Comment from Harald Hartmann
Sorry, this should not be a reproach of "tag for the render". And certainly, anyone can add new keys, but it should have a benefit, not?
-
Comment from samuelrussell
There is a class of infrastructure on the ground that can be coherently specified now. It is a non-transient permanent erection to building code or by state institutions. The infrastructure fills fairly basic physical needs. I am not seeing the problem. It is specified in relation to existing key structures and tags, not with a novel schematic. I am not not seeing the problem.
Nodes (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |