Changeset: 52341792
auto-matching wikidata tags based on wikipedia tags per @talk discussion. Further cleanup will be done using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikidata%2BOSM_SPARQL_query_service
Closed by nyuriks
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (12712 en) |
---|
Discussion
-
Comment from Rom1
Hi, i don't agree with some of these modifications. Example : http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4469858091/history where you added a wikidata tag althought already exists the tag brand:wikidata (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata#brand:wikidata.3D.2A)
Thanks for the correction -
Comment from nyuriks
Rom1, I agree - wikidata should not be set for a place of business that is a chain - e.g. Mc Donalds. As discussed in the @talk, this is just the first step that allows rapid search for all such places. The next step is to move all wikipedia and wikidata tags to brand:* for the chains, as well as other things like subjects and species.
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
@nyuriks whereabouts was this mechanical edit discussed?
- Comment from nyuriks
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
That doesn't say "I'm going to add lots of links that I know are wrong", which is what is being complained about here.
In particular, it doesn't address concerns raised in that thread e.g. at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078756.html (incidentally similar to what I raised at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43749373#map=6/53.403/-1.581 ).
By automatically importing wikidata into OSM you're devaluing the work of all the OSM contributors who've taken the time to check the links that they're adding.
-
Comment from nyuriks
I have reverted all of the relations and nodes that contained "#" in their "wikipedia" tag. I put together some thoughts on how wikipedia/wikidata should be validated and improved - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
You haven't addressed the places where you've added wikidata entries in error; the very first issue raised on this changeset discussion.
-
Comment from nyuriks
SomeoneElse, I posted about it to the @talk about an hour ago, please take a look. Once community agrees that this is ok, I will fix them all. Without it, it would be a partial fix for just a few instances.
- Metz (26686463), v32
- Sarreguemines (26691730), v20
- Maizières-lès-Metz (26694539), v17
- Woustviller (26694922), v12
- Dieuze (26695345), v18
- Vitry-sur-Orne (26695827), v14
- Champigneulles (26697458), v11
- Clouange (26697506), v15
- Marly (26697878), v12
- Alsting (26698181), v14
- Pulnoy (26698409), v12
- Many (78547610), v16
- Völklingen (80120768), v13
- Kleinblittersdorf (105913937), v8
- Überherrn (240064298), v8
- Großrosseln (240099673), v5
- Völklingen (245597940), v16
- Dieding (247320649), v8
- Rhodes (247324440), v16
- Fribourg (247324717), v16
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |