Changeset: 57157508
add back leisure=nature_reserve, which got removed accindentally in changeset 54635498
Closed by datendelphin
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (13522 en_GB) |
---|---|
source | parks.swiss |
Discussion
-
Comment from Rom1
But it concerns french natural parks and these kind of park shouldn't be tagged with leisure=nature_reserve. Look at the definition between https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area One important rule un OSM is not tagging for rendering (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).
-
Comment from datendelphin
But this changeset only touches Swiss parks. Which one do you think is French?
-
Comment from Rom1
My mistake, i thought they were french. But even they are swiss, the rule for these natural park shoud be the same i.e. without the tag leisure=natural_reserve.
-
Comment from datendelphin
I don't think so no. That is contested. leisure=nature_reserve is very simple and does not allow for fine grained mapping, true. But still those parks fit the description. By your proposed removal, all Swiss parks except one would currently vanish, which is not fair when I look at all the surrounding parks. I encourage map providers to use the finer grained scheme, but I oppose removing said tag in Switzerland.
-
Comment from Rom1
I will not discuss your choice for Switzerland. In France, it was recently discuss here (in french) http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Rendu-OSM-des-Parcs-naturels-regionaux-PNR-td5908000.html#a5908208
Relations (4)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |