Changeset: 60690574
If a road doesn't have explicit "Yes" for vehicle som services like GrapHopper won't route there. Added "Yes" for the serviceroad.
Closed by Wilmann
Tags
changesets_count | 13 |
---|---|
created_by | iD 2.9.2 |
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit |
ideditor:walkthrough_progress | welcome;navigation;point;line;startEditing |
ideditor:walkthrough_started | yes |
imagery_used | Norway Orthophoto |
locale | en-US |
Discussion
-
Comment from Gazer75
This is a router problem not OSM problem. We can't add access tags for every conceivable option. Defaults are here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Norway
-
Comment from thomfre
What's the problem with adding access tags? How does it hurt to make explicit tags, and not just rely on implicit tagging?
-
Comment from thomfre
Sorry, I was a bit too quick with my previous reply. I also work with GraphHopper, and it is true that GraphHopper needs explicit access tags, but only for barriers. I thought that was what @Wilmann had done (we know each other, so I assumed more than I should have).
-
Comment from Gazer75
So what happen to barriers with no access tags? I hope you ignore them in that case. People may survey a gate and add it, but do not know the access rights for said gate.
-
Comment from thomfre
To clarify: I work _with_ GraphHopper data. I don't work for them. As far as I know, they treat all barriers as blocking, unless they have access permission set.
Ways (1)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |