Changeset: 37321244
Removed paths disconnected from the network and of no value
Closed by Marco @ Sente
Tags
created_by | iD 1.8.5 |
---|---|
host | https://www.openstreetmap.org/id |
imagery_used | Bing |
locale | en-us |
Discussion
-
Comment from mathieuS
Why would you remove the path attribute of the bridges !?
Bridge does not tell you which is the underlying physical feature. You need a highway=* key-value pair.
-
Comment from mathieuS
Reverted in changeset #58678431
-
Comment from Marco @ Sente
Paths not connected to anything are not helpful. If you add them back then connect them to some other ways, street or otherwise. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways :
"Unconnected ways mean that any applications which rely on routing (like SatNav systems) will not be able to route into that way, or will not be routed via the quickest or shortest route.
Also, if the gap between the ways is significant, then users looking at a map on their computer screen or a printed map may see a gap between the ways on their map and be misled to believe there is no way through between one road and another"
-
Comment from mathieuS
Don't map for the renderer, don't map for the router.
Do not confuse unconnected ways and ways connecting to a highway area (a pedestrian area in this case).
Routing applications are able to route through a highway area (squares, etc.).
If you think the ways should be connected to other ways directly, then do that. But in no case you should remove a physical feature that was correctly mapped.
-
Comment from Marco @ Sente
My mistake, I didn't realize the bridges were connected to the Place de la Navigation. Sorry for the trouble.
Ways (4)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |