Changeset: 41401828
Walking the Bounds, Rushcliffe, Notts, UK (bring CPs into good order) (beeston and stapleford (unparished), nottingham (unparished) + sawley)
Closed by alexkemp
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (10526 en_GB) |
---|---|
source | OS_BoundaryLines; OS OpenData StreetView; Bing |
Discussion
-
Comment from SK53
Hi Alex, Please dont add (unparished) to names. It breaks all sort of things & Nottingham has never been called N* (unparished).
The fact that it is unparished merely means in OSM terms that there is no admin_level=10 relation within the relevant part of the authority. It is therefore readily captured by simple queries about what is within something else.
-
Comment from alexkemp
Hi Jerry. “(Unparished)” is how the admin bodies (the councils) themselves refer to their unparished areas, and hence is why I call them that. Go argue with the councils if you disagree.
Please explain - explicitly - some of these many things that adding “(Unparished)” to the name breaks.
Did you notice that I added a Label to the Relation, explicitly so that the “(Unparished)” did not need to show? Please argue with whoever programs that specific feature if it is ignored.
Your statement “no admin_level=10 ... readily captured by simple queries” is complete nonsense in my experience. Months of testing in Carlton was utterly fruitless until I added an Arnold & Carlton (Unparished) relation, when it magically transformed & worked. Have you actually performed such extensive testing yourself, or is this just intellectual off-the-top-of-the-head conjecture?
I appreciate that I'm stomping in my big boots through areas that you & Will have previously mapped, but it is bound to happen, and is the reason that I left Beeston until last, so that I had built up sufficient mapping-mass to be able to cope with it all.
-
Comment from alexkemp
Both Beeston + Nottingham level-10 relations have had the name changed to remove 'unparished' (even though that is the official description). I have relied on a ‘designation=non-civil_parish’ entry to discriminate between these & real CPs. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Csmale/ukboundaries for a fuller description.
I actually want to be able to remove the Nottingham level-8 + 10 relations & convert City-of-Nottingham to level-6;8;10.
Relations (3)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |