Changeset: 42257527
Hasting NE updates
Closed by ELadner
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (11005 en) |
---|---|
source | Bing |
Discussion
-
Comment from maxerickson
Do I understand correctly that this edit largely consists of selecting all the ways and deleting most of the tiger import tags from them?
I usually remove tiger tags after I have reviewed the geometry and added a surface tag, but it seems unlikely that the ways were individually reviewed here. What's the benefit of knocking the tags off?
-
Comment from ToeBee
Actually, JOSM automatically removes several TIGER tags on any ways that are otherwise modified during an editing session. These were discussed a while ago on the talk-us mailing list and determined to be entirely useless. The full list of automatically removed tags can be found in the JOSM source: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/osm/OsmPrimitive.java?rev=8901#L687
I believe iD has a similar list.
-
Comment from ELadner
The whole area was compared against the 2015 Tiger data and the Adams County GIS system (where streets stop/start based on parcel address, etc). The original TIGER data is inaccurate and gets mashed up over time and the ZIP data is pretty useless (esp with zip_right_1, zip_right_2, etc..).
-
Comment from maxerickson
I agree that the tiger tags are largely useless, it's just wasn't clear to me how much individual attention each of the 999 ways received. If the comparison was quick, there's room to argue about whether an edit just scrubbing them off is worthwhile. If they've been carefully compared to the county data, it's probably good to also go ahead and remove the tiger:reviewed tag (some people only do that on ways they've surveyed, but there's other people removing it without even reviewing the geometry against any imagery...).
@Toebee: there's 15 nodes in the changeset, so the edit is mostly to the tags on the ways, removing more tiger tags than the automatic operation. I have a preset in JOSM that removes all of the tiger tags and use it where I have set the surface tag and I feel I've looked close enough at the way/imagery/Tiger 2015, but like I say above, it wasn't clear how much review each way got here.
- Avalon Lane (14007939), v3
- B Street (14009672), v4
- BNSF 0117 House Track (237172781), v3
- BNSF 7135 H&H (14007584), v5
- BNSF 7185 City Iron Track (14007612), v5
- BNSF Giltner Subdivision (237170146), v3
- BNSF Giltner Subdivision (14007535), v4
- BNSF Hastings Subdivision Main (140486245), v38
- BNSF Hastings Subdivision Main (14007523), v11
- BNSF Lester Sub East Wye Main (14007548), v7
- Campus Drive (14007504), v3
- Campus Drive (14007503), v3
- Cardinal Lane (14005922), v3
- Centennial Avenue (14009474), v3
- Chestnut Avenue (14007984), v3
- Chestnut Avenue (14007982), v3
- Circle A (14010032), v2
- Circle A (14010031), v2
- Circle B (14002154), v3
- Circle C (14002205), v3
Nodes (15)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |