Changeset: 61437634
missing tag
Closed by smb1001
Tags
build | 2.5-37-ga38498b2 |
---|---|
created_by | Potlatch 2 |
version | 2.5 |
Discussion
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Does an admin_level make sense here? Surely these have absolutely no administrative function.
-
Comment from smb1001
You make a good point, and initially I didn't have one until reading the boundary=historic wiki page. I added the historic counties as they're not really 'historic' but current in a non-administrative sense. Similarly they had administrative function but only historically, so I'm not sure which to go with. Others have already written to me claiming the historic counties have no place on the map (which I strongly disagree with), so I suspect there'll be a full discussion of all this at some point!
-
Comment from DaveF
Could you please refrain from adding historic data to the OSM. You've previously been asked to remove your previous edits, which belong in OHM. I've started a discussion on Talk-GB https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021751.html
Relations (2)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |