Changeset: 67825548
Gebäudeumrisse und Straßen Osttirol, folgt #67824479
Closed by deleted
Tags
created_by | JOSM/1.5 (14832 de) |
---|---|
source | Orthophoto: www.geoimage.at (c) |
Discussion
-
Comment from user_7581226
Während meiner Mapping Tätigkeit in dieser Region, wurden meine Edits durch seltsame Eingriffe in die OpenStreetMap Datenbank, mehrfach zurückgesetzt. Ich bezichtige den User Nakaner Firma Geofabrik hierbei seine Administrationsrechte Missbraucht zu haben.
Johann Haag
im Juli 2019 -
Comment from user_7581226
Hinweis, warum ich hier Linien gelöscht habe, ist dadurch begründet, da ich gemerkt habe, dass neuangegte Elemente, das Rücksetzenen per Servereingriffe verhindert haben. Ich war vordem bemüht, die Historie von Objekten jeweils zu erhalten, genau das hat die Person ausgenutzt, um Rücksetzungen zu vertuschen. Das zurücksetzen neuangelegter Elemente hätte hingegen auffällige Löcher verursacht.
-
Comment from freebeer
you are really digging yourself into a hole.
anyone can repair things and is encouraged to do so particularly when proper procedures are ignored.
and now you are justifying deleting the contributions made by others based on the misled assumption that by making a revert non-trivial, it is not possible?
i have a surprise for you, it happens regularly despite what happens in attempts to hinder it.
it seems you are quite happy to sabotage osm and damage the work of others in order to advance your own agenda which in the past weeks of activity has had me increasingly and now completely baffled.
the phrases meltdown and high-speed-car-crash-in-slow-motion are the best i can describe things as an outsider, undercover operative taking orders from F¡гма Ģеоfаbrıĸ.
-
Comment from user_7581226
Hello freebear, In months I have been trying to make OpenStreetMap better in the given region. Can you understand that from me here experienced. The region is very big, and I only knew how to help by improving everything. Nevertheless, my changes have disappeared several times as if by magic. regards
-
Comment from freebeer
servus geocodec,
actually, i must apologise for not fully understanding when presented below a list of deleted ways, which with a few Stichproben linked to other mappers' contributions.
with a better view of this presented by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67825548
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67825548
(argh i hate having a broken mouse and only a tablet touchscreen kezboard)
there was nothing actually deleted without being redrawn, very different from my first impressions and how you used these commentaries to launch an attack on Michael.this generally goes against the agreed rules to preserve the fact of other mappers' contributions, much like to use a dedicated and identifiable account for imports, that would have kept you out of the predicament of being unable to separate bad imported data or processes from good manual labour.
the important thing is to realise the rules are there for a reason and to respect and follow them as they are not a personal attack, as it seems you feel DWG actions are, but are there for the benefit of other mappers as well in this community.
i cannot see why you would bring this up as this changeset has not been reverted, especially bringing up unprovoked the idea of sabotaging a revert action that anyone can perform.
throwing around these paranoid conspiracy theories has backfired by causing me to assume the worst for this changeset.
still, as others have said, not using a consistent linkable account identity and carrying out edits to thwart edit actions goes very much against the rules, that i have only experienced the worst malicious vandals seeking to break, and this is not the company i wish to see you associated with, having seen the results of other mappers truly turning not just bad, but destructive to the project and community.
i cannot say anything about the reverts performed, but i suspect they are justified placed into proper context, and i would need to be shown a changeset as i do not follow DWG or moderator activity.
however osm is a community and failing to abide by community standards places you at odds with the community in ways that are guaranteed to alienate some, just as i regularly receive criticism for failing to act a certain way, that i am sure some would like to see acted upon and find me blocked from contributing in the future.
but i know i must accept that as part of the condition of being able to participate as i do trying to clean up damage, and to live within the rules and respect others and their contributions.
-
Comment from user_7581226
I respect your efforts to shed light on the matter because that confirms my trust in the DWG. JH
- 674816851, v1
- 674816852, v1
- 674816853, v1
- 674816854, v1
- 674816855, v1
- 674816856, v1
- 674816857, v1
- 674816858, v1
- 674816859, v1
- 674816860, v1
- 674816861, v1
- 674816862, v1
- 674816863, v1
- 674816864, v1
- 674816865, v1
- 674816866, v1
- 674816867, v1
- 674816868, v1
- 674816871, v1
- 674816874, v1
Relations (2)
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |