1. The waterway=river tag in the outer way of the river relation is not a valid tag. (it also trigger osm2pgsql to import it as two polygons)

    Closed · #54562964
    0

  2. Icorrect building levels

    Closed · #52633605
    0

  3. Icorrect building levels

    Closed · #52633253
    0

  4. Icorrect building levels

    Closed · #52633127
    0

  5. Icorrect building levels

    Closed · #52633052
    0

  6. Icorrect building levels

    Closed · #52632925
    0

  7. This is a chimney

    Closed · #52632799
    0

  8. This building definietly does not hav 43 levels.

    Closed · #52632714
    0

  9. This building definietly does not hav 91 levels.

    Closed · #52632579
    0

  10. This building definietly does not hav 204 levels.

    Closed · #52632433
    0

  11. This building definietly does not hav 204 levels.

    Closed · #52631036
    0

  12. This building definietly does not hav 204 levels.

    Closed · #52630712
    0

  13. After it has been pointed out in a discussion, that the Space Needle is definitely not a communication_tower, I changed it to man_made=tower / tower:type=observation (which should be much more fitting as I realize now)

    Closed · #51315329
    0

  14. building=tower for the base footprint is misleading (and not an officially supported attribute for buildings .... its sometimes used for big TV-towers but not for big skyscrapers). Here, building=yes is sufficient.

    Closed · #47951296
    0

  15. Added man_made=communications_tower to make clear this is a big TV tower.

    Closed · #47950716
    2

  16. The height of this building was totally off (111.8m ????)

    Closed · #44685111
    0

  17. The height of this building was totally off (192.6m ????)

    Closed · #44685072
    0

  18. The height of this building was totally off (281.5m ????)

    Closed · #44685036
    0

  19. This school has definitely not 193 building:levels :-)

    Closed · #44684995
    0

  20. building:levels were missing

    Closed · #44659873
    0
Load more