Yep, fully agree: The geography is not to be challenged. What was missing was assignment of names to the different places.

Thus the imported points “this sound is called bla-bla-bla”, identify it as a sound and assign the name, then delete the point..

That is.

Which is also the reason why the descriptions are included.

So: Participate.

PS: There ARE instances where cabin/hut locatinos seem to be in the water. For those data evaluation MAY imply that coastlines MIGHT be reconsidered - or I THINK the chance that coordinates were taken by the cabin are higher than coordinates were taken along the coastline.

This also leave some observations. I noticed that the Dim reservoir was ‘improved’ since I entered it initially: 1) Someone redrew the banks following exactly the size it happened to have the day Bing photographed it. These dam reservoirs change size according to time of year, water input and water output. I still think the most correct is to show its maximum size. However I am not going to re-correct. 2) Someone also cut up the banks in several pieces thus avoiding the closed object figure. I DID join these to have one figure that could then be marked as a reservoir.

Wauw, thanks. That’s right - including Bing for reference: Last time the cycle map gave a good base and the bleak deforested future lake bed as seen from Bing was a good control reference…

Yep, you are unquestionably right. Then it’s the hard way, if I ever try…