Changeset: 143128522
#vandalism
Closed by pitscheplatsch
Tags
changesets_count | 1198 |
---|---|
created_by | osm-revert 1.2.1.231022 |
revert:fix:node | 7583 |
revert:fix:way | 152 |
revert:id | https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143124536 |
website | https://revert.monicz.dev |
Discussion
-
Comment from mmd
There's something wrong with the revert tool, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/540424027/history lost almost half of its tags, e.g. website. I checked some other nodes, and they all had similar issues.
-
Comment from mmd
Reported as https://github.com/Zaczero/osm-revert/issues/18
-
Comment from NorthCrab
^ Responded :-)
-
Comment from mmd
So the revert tool works as designed here... will continue the discussion over at Github.
-
Comment from pitscheplatsch
Yes, I tried to revert a few changesets in this area, but unfortunately I had issues with the second one. I think I'd better leave this task to others.
There may also have been conflicts when reverting, because if I saw it correctly, a revert changeset was also open in parallel from someone else ... please see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143134485
-
Comment from NorthCrab
osmtools and osm-revert (from the testing so far) are compatible with each other and can run just fine in parallel :-)
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Any changeset-based revert tools is likely to fail, because changets with different vandalism can occur in parallel. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400884853/history
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
I've just reverted a number of nodes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143204094 . Can anyone who gets a chance have a look and see if any nodes in that changeset are misplaced? The nodes of e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5051304 no longer seem to be. My changeset doesn't address everything in this changeset, because it's one in a series. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400884853/historyhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400884853/history has so far not yet been done.
-
Comment from SomeoneElse
Also, _please_ use meaningful changeset comments, rather than just some hashtag. I can see that there is a "revert:id" in the changeset tags, but what would be useful to know would be how you identified and what needed to be reverted, what remains not yet reverted.
- 1802990321, v25
- 1802991545, v20
- 1802991546, v21
- 1803008914, v22
- 1803008931, v22
- 1803009548, v18
- 1803009554, v19
- 1803009555, v18
- 1803011565, v22
- 1803011571, v17
- 1803011576, v16
- 1803012206, v18
- 1803012210, v17
- 1803012214, v20
- 1803016850, v17
- 1803022702, v18
- 1803022707, v17
- 1803022711, v18
- 1803031555, v16
- 1803031556, v17
Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.
Hosting is supported by Fastly, OSMF corporate members, and other partners.
https://openstreetmap.org/copyright | https://openstreetmap.org |
Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license |